Skip to content

Adds Data Handling section to the README#78

Merged
JyotinderSingh merged 3 commits intomainfrom
readme-updates
Mar 9, 2026
Merged

Adds Data Handling section to the README#78
JyotinderSingh merged 3 commits intomainfrom
readme-updates

Conversation

@JyotinderSingh
Copy link
Collaborator

@JyotinderSingh JyotinderSingh commented Mar 9, 2026

  1. Adds Data Handling section to the README to document the Data and volumes APIs.
  2. Removed Pulumi CLI requirement from prerequisites and updated the cleanup section. Pulumi is auto-installed on first run, and users need not install it manually.

Removed Pulumi CLI requirement from prerequisites and updated the cleanup section.

Pulumi is auto-installed on first run, and users need not install it manually.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request streamlines the user experience by clarifying the installation and cleanup processes. It removes the need for users to manually install the Pulumi CLI, as it is now automatically handled, and simplifies the description of resource cleanup by removing redundant mentions of Pulumi.

Highlights

  • Prerequisites: Removed the manual installation requirement for the Pulumi CLI from the prerequisites section, as it is now auto-installed on first use.
  • Cleanup Section: Updated the cleanup section to remove the explicit mention of Pulumi when describing the removal of GKE cluster and accelerator node pools.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • README.md
    • Removed the Pulumi CLI from the prerequisites list.
    • Updated the cleanup section to remove the explicit mention of Pulumi for GKE cluster removal.
Activity
  • No human activity has been recorded on this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the README.md to improve the user experience. It correctly removes the manual installation requirement for the Pulumi CLI, as it is now automatically installed on the first run. It also removes a reference to Pulumi in the resource cleanup section, which aligns with the project's goal of hiding implementation details from the user. The changes are accurate and improve the clarity of the documentation.

Note: Security Review has been skipped due to the limited scope of the PR.

@JyotinderSingh JyotinderSingh changed the title Update README by removing Pulumi CLI mention Adds Data Handling section to the README Mar 9, 2026

Keras Remote provides a declarative and performant Data API to seamlessly make your local and cloud data available to your remote functions.

The Data API is designed to be read-only. It reliably delivers data to your pods at the start of a job. For saving model outputs or checkpointing, you should write directly to GCS from within your function.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we provide guidance on where in GCS to write? Or leave it completely up to the user?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's okay to leave it to the user since we don't really have any framework specific guidance to provide at this stage.


The simplest and most Pythonic approach is to pass `Data` objects as regular function arguments. The `Data` class wraps a local file/directory path or a Google Cloud Storage (GCS) URI.

On the remote pod, these objects are automatically resolved into plain string paths pointing to the downloaded files, meaning your function code never needs to know about GCS or cloud storage APIs.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great!

@JyotinderSingh JyotinderSingh requested a review from jeffcarp March 9, 2026 18:12
@JyotinderSingh JyotinderSingh merged commit d3fd037 into main Mar 9, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants